Explanation
Godinez argues that the traditional method of land measurement, which was based on the effort required to plow, is not useful for modern purposes such as determining housing capacity. This inadequacy has necessitated the adoption of new land measures.
A. There is no discussion about the ease of measuring land in the argument.
B. Accuracy is not the primary focus of the argument; rather, it is about the suitability of the measurement for modern land use.
C. The argument does not compare the old and new methods in terms of how they would evaluate plots' equality.
D. The argument does not explicitly state that the realization of plowing time's inadequacy was the reason for adopting modern measures; it only implies that new measures became necessary.
E. (Correct Response) This option directly relates to the argument's main point. Godinez is saying that as land uses became more diverse, the old method of measuring land was no longer sufficient, thus leading to the adoption of new measures like acreage.
Option E is the main conclusion of Godinez’s argument, stating the necessity for new land measures in the face of diversified land use.