top of page

LSAT Preptest 152, Section 2, Question 4

"In view of the considerable length…"

Explanation

The argument implies that regardless of direct involvement or evidence, the tenure itself is sufficient reason for the chief to be held accountable for corruption within their department. We're looking for a principle that aligns with holding a leader accountable solely based on their position and tenure, even without direct evidence of involvement.

A. The principle specifies "knowingly tolerates," which adds a condition not present in the argument. The argument makes a case for accountability without needing knowledge of the corruption as a prerequisite. 


B. While it implies knowledge about the corruption, this is not the same as being accountable due to tenure and position. 


C. This option actually argues against the argument's conclusion by stating a supervisor should not be held accountable without a reasonable expectation of knowledge.


D. It discusses expectations of corrective action, not accountability, and is not relevant to the argument's focus on accountability due to tenure. 


E. (Correct Response) This principle supports the argument by suggesting that tenure in a position of authority is in itself a reason for accountability, eliminating any excuse that could absolve the person of responsibility for widespread corruption, consistent with the argument's stance that the chief's lack of direct involvement does not matter.

Option E aligns with the argument by establishing that tenure in a position of authority carries inherent responsibility, regardless of direct involvement in the corrupt actions of subordinates.

bottom of page