Explanation
In this question, we're assessing which option least reinforces the argument concerning Shakespeare's knowledge source for "The Winter's Tale."
A. (Correct Response) The presence of Latin phrases in Shakespeare's plays does not necessarily inform us about his ability to understand Greek or how he accessed Greek literature. Knowing Latin does not equate to knowing Greek, and it does not indicate whether he read "Alcestis" in Greek, Latin, or another form. Therefore, this option does the least to strengthen the argument that Shakespeare relied on a Latin translation for "The Winter's Tale."
B. If the only English version of "Alcestis" differed from "The Winter's Tale," and Shakespeare's play didn't share these differences, it might suggest he used a source other than the English translation, potentially the Latin one, thus strengthening the argument.
C. If a faithful Latin translation was available and widely read during the 1600s, it would support the argument that Shakespeare could have used this translation for his work.
D. Evidence that Shakespeare attended grammar school, where he would have learned Latin, supports the possibility that he could have accessed and understood Latin translations of Greek plays.
E. If Shakespeare relied on Latin translations for other Greek plays, it would suggest a pattern of accessing Greek works through Latin, thereby supporting the argument.
Option A is the one that least strengthens the argument because it does not directly contribute to our understanding of Shakespeare's access to Greek texts or his potential use of Latin translations.